The most pertinent question is whether cricket is a lazy sport.
Cricket is the most beloved sport across the world. Cricket includes muscular gaming like running for wicket and fast bowling, but most of this game’s pace is incremental and lethargic. Thus, we can term cricket as a lazy sport. But we cannot neglect certain facets in cricket that are robust and require energetic movements.
During a cricket match, two players remain on the crease, and the rest nine members relax. On the bowling side, only bowlers are most and playful, whereas others remain moderately agile. Batting, bowling, wicketkeeping, and fielding are the four major avenues in the cricket match. They require the active participation of players but not all the time. The players on the crease are the most active members in the game, and others are in the passive state.
Suppose we consider other sports such as basketball and football. In these sports, all the players are agile and active, but nothing much happens in cricket. In cricket, all the players of both teams are not entirely functional. They remain vibrant only while playing their part in the game. However, it is inappropriate to state that cricket is eventually a lethargic game gruffly.
The players are active in the event, but they are not absorbed in action during the entire course. All these factors support the statement that cricket is a lazy sport. If you are lazy, then cricket is not just a worthy sport to binge-watch, but for playing also, it will be the right choice. It won’t eat up your energy and vitality like other outdoor activities but will physically churn your body. All the justifications support us in culminating that cricket is a partially lazy sport with certain avenues of vital elements.